Okay, you are extremely inconsistent, and your contradictions said the same thing I did...
No, not okay Sass. "...your contradictions said the same thing i did...", have any idea how wrong that sentence is?
Quote:
Nothing about this was relevant to what you quoted. All you did was say what I said you said.
Because what i quoted made zero logical sense. And how is explaining my suggestion to someone who appears to be not that bright irrelevant in my own thread?
Quote:
Of course it isn't the same. It also isn't relevant.
So my refutal that they aren't the same isn't relevant to your claim that they are? Arguing against you is ****ing surreal you know.
Quote:
If it's a high level item and the mods match your build goals, you can try it, BoE or not. Binding may make some reluctant, but that won't apply to all.
I never claimed you can't try it, so again you're arguing against yourself. Bye now.
Quote:
If you make the items better, you only hurt yourself by not binding. If you equip it anyway, it's like saying no to free damage or whatever mod it is.
Then you bind, kays. Everyone more sensible and intelligent then you wanting to have a feel of an item before they make the decision to bind can do just that, be more sensible and intelligent then you.
Quote:
You make it so that all items would end up bound anyway. We don't know if end game items need to be boosted or not, so this system still has to balance around them binding.
No **** captain obvious.
Quote:
The end result is the same as Blizz's BoE system.
Wow... talk about being inconsistent, remember this: "Of course it isn't the same."
Quote:
That's what I said...
You lie, what you said was: "You assume that people will never equip a low Griffon because of BoE." Liars can **** off.
Quote:
You also extended your opinion to everyone when explaining it.
What opinion? I spoke about what i would do in if i found a particular item and how it being BoE or not would affect that decision.
Quote:
That...wasn't a complete thought...
If it doesn't suit the build (say...a smiter), then they wouldn't have equipped it, so no binding. People can experiment still, and they'll naturally be reluctant. Regardless of bind, people will use even a low one if they want / need to.
Why make people reluctant to try out a cool new item they found just because they have to keep in mind an untoughtful and stupid system disallowing them to sell off an item as soon as they equip it? And you expect everyone to know exactly what they want/need the first few times they played the game?
Quote:
Your system does. Your "optional feature" is a guaranteed bind.
What? My system does what? What my "optional feature"? What are you talking about?
My question was, "You think Blizzard will force BoE on us then allow for an UnBoE?". You failed to answer the question. No, that's wrong, you didn't even attempt at answering the question.
Quote:
Because you insist I'm wrong while you say the exact same thing, and the parts that are different is you failing to see how you result in exactly what BoE is doing now.
"The parts that are different are the same". You are the master of making sense. Why do i even bother, i'm talking to a wall here.
Quote:
You implied it, which is incorrect.
No i didn't imply it. You completely fail at comprehending sentences properly. Can't help you.
Quote:
If you can upgrade easily, you wouldn't feel cheated.
Your choice of words makes it seems upgrading wont' happen and that you have to essentially just deal with it."Upgrading" to a better item won't UnBoE the previous item (you completely disregard this), so you're left with having to salvage those or whatever. In essence that means its a fact that i am right and you are wrong.
Quote:
100%. You have some neat ideas sometimes, but you really need to learn how to discuss anything. Pulling extremes, siding with the other and making it seem like it's an opposite view, illogical progressions, dismissing rebuttals as "not refuting", etc are not going to help you.
You must be kidding. There's a difference between being nuanced and inconsistent.
Quote:
I not only did refute the point, I did call you out on your tactic. Rather than defend your system, you attacked the other.
What tactic? Capslocking a word as to show its significance within a sentence? Omg, internet police arrest me. You didn't refute a single statement i made.
Quote:
Your point was a freedom of choice. I most certainly did refute your assertion that you were the only one with freedom, which was what you implied via said capslock.
I implied i was the only one with freedom as i capslocked the word "free"? AHAHAHA, i lol'ed, hard. Good one Sass.
Quote:
If you were simply unaware of the subtleties of language, that's fine. I'm simply pointing out what you tell the reader and whether or not it's true.
In the case the reader is illiterate i am truly sorry, but i can't help you.
Quote:
A part of your system, which opposes Blizz's:
You imply Blizz's system does not unbind by saying that your system is the one that does.
You even go so far as to call me a druggy for suggesting it:Yet you can go on and act as if you were all for it all along.
So your suggestion is that Blizzard's BoE policy isn't Blizzard's BoE policy, and therefor my suggestion is irrelevant. And you wonder why i call you a druggy?
Get back to me when Blizzard announces we can in fact unbound bound items, which will be never, incidentally that would also suite me just fine.
Don't bother replying to me as I have nothing more to say to you, you clearly do not understand English sufficiently enough nor even try at comprehending and correctly interpreting my suggestions, arguments and sentences/words.. Sorry, i can't help you understand the concept of a valid argument either. Replying to your faulty interpretations of the simply literal meaning of words and sentences is highly frustrating. But maybe that's what you were going for.|||Again, thanks for saying what I've been saying, yet taking an opposing view to your own suggestion.
Your system brings no solution to binding. It's just a way to make them more powerful while not affecting usage. When they're all bound (you admit to this), there aren't any weaker by comparison. It's the exact same as if there was no boost and all were bound.
Also, you constantly claim I didn't refute any points. You need to read the words over again.
没有评论:
发表评论